Print Print
CKS is no longer commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE remains committed to providing a replacement service for CKS and is currently reviewing its options. In the meantime, although CKS content is now not being maintained, it still remains relevant and will continue to be made available. CKS content was generated under a programme of topic creation and update. To check if the topic you are viewing is current or out of date, please refer to the topic publication details by clicking on the 'How up-to-date is this topic?' link in the left hand menu on individual topic pages.

Incontinence - urinary, in women - Management
What treatment might be offered in secondary care to a woman with stress urinary incontinence in whom conservative measures have failed?

  • The following treatments are recommended by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE):
    • Retropubic mid-urethral tape procedures using a 'bottom up' approach. Open colposuspension and autologous rectal fascial sling are recommended alternatives.
    • Synthetic slings using a retropubic 'top down' approach or a transobturator foramen approach are also alternatives, provided the woman is made aware of the lack of long-term outcome data. Long-term complications include voiding difficulties and the development of urgency and urge incontinence.
    • Intramural urethral bulking agents are also an acceptable alternative, provided the woman is made aware that:
      • Adverse effects are common but mainly transient and include acute retention, haematuria, dysuria, frequency, and urinary tract infection.
      • Repeat injections may be required to achieve efficacy.
      • Efficacy diminishes with time.
      • The procedure is not as effective as a retropubic suspension or sling.
    • An artificial urinary sphincter should be recommended only if previous surgery failed. Subjective cure rates are high, but:
      • Adverse effects included pump malfunction and urinary retention.
      • Device removal and revision were common.
  • NICE does not recommend:
    • Laparoscopic colposuspension as a routine procedure.
    • Anterior colporrhaphy, needle suspensions, paravaginal defect repair, and the Marshell–Marchetti–Krannz procedure.
Clarification / Additional information
  • Treatment aims to augment urethral closure or support or stabilize the bladder neck or urethra.
  • Operations that augment urethral sphincter closure include:
    • Injection of urethral bulking agents into the submucosal tissue of the urethra or bladder neck aims to prevent stress incontinence by increasing the resistance to flow.
    • Artificial urinary sphincters: an occlusive cuff is inserted around the urethra and, when inflated, exerts a constant closure pressure which is maintained by an inflated pressure-regulated balloon. When the woman wishes to pass urine, she manually operates a small pump in the labium.
  • Procedures to stabilize the bladder neck and urethra include:
    • Procedures that prevent the downward displacement of the urethra by using sutures to secure the paraurethral or vaginal tissues to a fixed structure, such as Burch colposuspension, the Marshall–Marchetti–Kranz procedure, and the vaginal obturator shelf procedure.
    • Minimally invasive procedures that suspend the paraurethral tissues by means of a suspensory suture secured to the rectus sheath and inserted under endoscopic control, such as the Raz, Pereyra, Stamey, and Gittes procedures.
    • Sling operations that stabilize the urethra by placing a strip of material around the underside of the urethra and securing it to a fixed structure above. These may be:
      • Fixed to the pubic arch or rectus sheath.
      • Inserted by open surgery: abdominal or combined abdominal and vaginal.
      • Minimally invasive: retropubic space (from bottom upwards or from top downwards or obturator foramen [from outside inwards, or from inside outwards]).

[National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health, 2006]

Basis for recommendation
  • These recommendations are based on expert advice from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) [National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health, 2006].
    • Retropubic suspension procedures:
      • Good evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indicates that open colposuspension is effective and has longevity. Laparoscopic colposuspension is equally effective.
      • When used solely for stress incontinence, long-term outcomes are poor for anterior colporrhaphy, needle suspensions, and paravaginal defect repair. There is no evidence that the Marshell–Marchetti–Krantz procedure offers any advantage over open colposuspension.
    • Synthetic slings: evidence from RCTs shows a comparable effect for open or laparoscopic colposuspension.
    • Bulking agents:
      • Controlled trials evaluating bulking agents are few, mainly small, and of poor quality. NICE concluded that bulking agents have poor efficacy and may be less effective than open surgery.
      • Case series show that any effect declines with time.
  • Artificial urinary sphincter: data are limited to cases series. Subjective cure rates are high.

© NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement